Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
European Journal of Inflammation (Sage Publications, Ltd.) ; : 1-4, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1443777

RESUMEN

We describe the case of a 78-year-old Italian woman with COVID-19 affected by Systemic Sclerosis with pulmonary fibrosis treated with Ruxolitinib (Ruxolitinib was provided free of charge by Novartis International AG). We chose Ruxolitinib, as a second-line treatment, after administering a standard therapy with hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir, due to a rapid deterioration in the patient's lung function. Ruxolitinib is a janus kinase inibithor with selectivity for subtypes JAK1 and JAK2. A rapid improvement in the patient's respiratory function, objectified with an increase in PO2/FiO2 value, has been observed in the 10 days after the introduction of Ruxolitinib. Surprisingly we noticed a reduction in pulmonary fibrosis by comparing the chest- CT made before and after the COVID-19 diagnosis. JAK/STAT signalling is involved both in pathogenesis of the second part of COVID-19 and in the modulation of fibrosis in patients with SSc. The use of ruxolitinib should be a new therapeutic option in patients with COVID-19 and lung fibrosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of European Journal of Inflammation (Sage Publications, Ltd.) is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

2.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 53(2): 346-351, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1401066

RESUMEN

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not recommended in COVID-19 patients receiving dexamethasone because of potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions affecting anticoagulant concentration and activity. To evaluate short- and long-term pharmacokinetic interactions, serial through and peak DOAC plasma levels were prospectively measured during and after dexamethasone therapy, as well as during the acute phase and after recovery from COVID-19 in hospitalized, non-critically ill patients undergoing treatment with DOACs. Thirty-three (18 males, mean age 79 years) consecutive patients received DOACs (17 apixaban, 12 rivaroxaban, 4 edoxaban) for atrial fibrillation (n = 22), venous thromboembolism (n = 10), and acute myocardial infarction (n = 1). Twenty-six patients also received dexamethasone at a dose of 6 mg once daily for a median of 14 days. Trough DOAC levels on dexamethasone were within and below expected reference ranges respectively in 87.5 and 8.3% of patients, with no statistically significant differences at 48-72 h and 14-21 days after dexamethasone discontinuation. Peak DOAC levels on dexamethasone were within expected reference ranges in 58.3% of patients, and below ranges in 33.3%, of whom over two thirds had low values also off dexamethasone. No significant differences in DOAC levels were found during hospitalization and after resolution of COVID-19. Overall, 28 patients were discharged alive, and none experienced thrombotic or bleeding events. In this study, dexamethasone administration or acute COVID-19 seemed not to affect DOAC levels in hospitalized, non-critically ill COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Dexametasona , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 17237, 2021 08 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1376211

RESUMEN

Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) are a non-specific high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) finding tipically observed in early Coronavirus disesase 19 (COVID-19) pneumonia. However, GGOs are also seen in other acute lung diseases, thus making challenging the differential diagnosis. To this aim, we investigated the performance of a radiomics-based machine learning method to discriminate GGOs due to COVID-19 from those due to other acute lung diseases. Two sets of patients were included: a first set of 28 patients (COVID) diagnosed with COVID-19 infection confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between March and April 2020 having (a) baseline HRCT at hospital admission and (b) predominant GGOs pattern on HRCT; a second set of 30 patients (nCOVID) showing (a) predominant GGOs pattern on HRCT performed between August 2019 and April 2020 and (b) availability of final diagnosis. Two readers independently segmented GGOs on HRCTs using a semi-automated approach, and radiomics features were extracted using a standard open source software (PyRadiomics). Partial least square (PLS) regression was used as the multivariate machine-learning algorithm. A leave-one-out nested cross-validation was implemented. PLS ß-weights of radiomics features, including the 5% features with the largest ß-weights in magnitude (top 5%), were obtained. The diagnostic performance of the radiomics model was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Youden's test assessed sensitivity and specificity of the classification. A null hypothesis probability threshold of 5% was chosen (p < 0.05). The predictive model delivered an AUC of 0.868 (Youden's index = 0.68, sensitivity = 93%, specificity 75%, p = 4.2 × 10-7). Of the seven features included in the top 5% features, five were texture-related. A radiomics-based machine learning signature showed the potential to accurately differentiate GGOs due to COVID-19 pneumonia from those due to other acute lung diseases. Most of the discriminant radiomics features were texture-related. This approach may assist clinician to adopt the appropriate management early, while improving the triage of patients.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Radiometría/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón , Aprendizaje Automático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
4.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 589409, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-993377

RESUMEN

One of the most striking reported symptoms in CoViD-19 is loss of smell and taste. The frequency of these impairments and their specificity as a potential central nervous system function biomarker are of great interest as a diagnostic clue for CoViD-19 infection as opposed to other similar symptomatologic diseases and because of their implication in viral pathogenesis. Here severe CoViD-19 was investigated by comparing self-report vs. testing of smell and taste, thus the objective severity of olfactory impairment and their possible correlation with other symptoms. Because a significant discrepancy between smell and taste testing vs. self-report results (p < 0.001) emerges in our result, we performed a statistical analysis highlighting disagreement among normosmia (p < 0.05), hyposmia, severe hyposmia, and anosmia (p < 0.001) and, in hypogeusia and severe hypogeusia, while no differences are observed in normogeusia and ageusia. Therefore, we analyzed the olfactory threshold by an objective test revealing the distribution of hyposmic (34%), severe hyposmic (48%), and anosmic (13%) patients in severe CoViD-19. In severe CoViD-19 patients, taste is lost in 4.3% of normosmic individuals, 31.9% of hyposmic individuals, 46.8% of severe hyposmic individuals, and 17% of anosmic individuals. Moreover, 95% of 100 CoViD-19 patients objectively tested were affected by smell dysfunction, while 47% were affected by taste dysfunction. Furthermore, analysis by objective testing also highlighted that the severity of smell dysfunction in CoViD-19 subjects did not correlate with age and sex. In conclusion, we report by objective testing that the majority of CoViD-19 patients report severe anosmia, that most of the subjects have olfactory impairment rather than taste impairment, and, finally, that the olfactory impairment correlate with symptom onset and hospitalization (p < 0.05). Patients who exhibit severe olfactory impairment had been hospitalized for about a week from symptom onset; double time has taken place in subjects with normosmia. Our results may be limited by the relatively small number of study participants, but these suggest by objective testing that hyposmia, severe hyposmia, and anosmia may relate directly to infection severity and neurological damage. The smell test assessment could be a potential screening symptom that might contribute to the decision to test suspected cases or guide quarantine instructions, further therapeutic approach, and evaluation of neurological damage.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA